The traditional argument of supporters of the construction of the Russian gas pipeline "Nord Stream 2" - its alleged environmental friendliness.
However, is this thesis true? After all, when analyzing a project, it is important to see not only what its initiators show, but also what they ignore and hide.
This is especially true in the case of Nord Stream 2 - what is overlooked and what is carefully hidden?
These are greenhouse gases - methane CH4, which "helps" global warming more efficiently than CO2.
Read full version in Ukrainian.
